Closure
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am writing to complain about the mishandling of my hosting account and poor quality customer service I received from your company on 16 August 2005.
On the morning of that day I noticed that my web site was reporting lots of errors apparently caused by missing files, and when I looked on the site I noticed that a lot of files were missing from the file structure. I phoned your technical support department and was informed that the only way this could have occurred was that someone (or something) had accessed my site via FTP and deleted the files. I was offered no other option as to the cause and as I had no proof that this had not happened I was left with no option but to investigate further myself. The call lasted no more than a couple of minutes.
I was worried that someone had hacked into my account so I immediately changed my FTP password, and then I manually re-uploaded all of my website content from a backup. I then noticed that there were other problems. The ODBC databases and the ASP.NET content I was using was no longer working.
Also, I received emails from site visitors saying that the site was still showing as not available at their location, even though I was able to see it. After a lot more investigation I realised that my website had been moved to a whole new server on the Fasthosts system, from FASTHOSTS74 to FASTHOSTS15. External users were unable to access my site as the I.P. of the site had also changed, and this change had yet to propagate across the DNS servers.
I then investigated further in the Fasthosts control panel and found that my ODBC connection settings had been deleted and my ASP.NET service appeared to have been turned off. I contacted technical support again, and after some investigation they confirmed that my site had indeed been moved to a different server due to “resource issues”. I was told that this move should have been seamless and all my relevant data and settings should have been transferred to the new server. In this case it had not happened, and the support representative arranged to make my site content from the old server available to me in a private folder on my new server. He also agreed to turn on ASP.NET again.
Later in the evening I phoned up a third time as my ASP.NET service still seemed to be out of action. Shortly after that it was turned on and I my site was returned to normal.
I understand the necessity to move content from one server to another from time to time, and that I am not paying for a totally resilient service. This is not the nature of my complaint. I do feel however that your company failed in several areas on this occasion:
- If the work to move my site was planned by your engineers, I should have been informed before the work so that I could have expected the DNS problems, etc. If the work was unforeseen, an email shortly after it had occurred would have been appreciated.
- When I phoned technical support initially, I should not have been “fobbed off” with the answer that someone had deleted my files via FTP. The support engineer should have investigated a little further and seen that my site had moved and that there could be issues arising from that.
- When the engineer(s) moved my content to the new server they apparently failed to copy all my data. They also failed to copy across my ODBC settings, and failed to re-enable my ASP.NET access. This is not an acceptable level of IT “workmanship”, in my opinion.
I would be interested in hearing your opinions on this matter.




That's PoliticalSpeak for, "Whacha gotta say about that, eh chum?"
BT techno gaff takes SMEs offline
The point about this is that Fasthosts boasted redundant network connectivity and then put them all of them through the above BT router, stoopid?
Fasthosts in email crisis
You still want to trust these guys?
Fasthosts faces trading standards inquiry
OK, so it's only a trading standards inquiry so whose worried?
Dell, Fasthosts and BT shamed for misleading advertising
Fasthosts involved in misleading advertising, who'd have thought?
I suppose it wouldn't be fair on Fasthosts to be too quick to form an unfair opinion of them... would it? Bless!
BT techno gaff takes SMEs offline
Fingers crossed!
I checked the fastnet T&Cs although they do reserve the right not to inform so that doesn't mean that they can just do things willynilly without informing their customers. They also do not guarentee that you won't loose business because of their business but that does not excuse them "breaking" your site. And it doesn't seem that they have provided a "fit for purpose" service.
BTW, I didn't mean to affect your "Can Siobhan see the Cube?" experiment, but hey, it's a freakin' cube, of COURSE I had to say something!
Emily, I know it wasn't intentional and I'm sure if I'd have posted that picture at 8.00am BST Siobhan would have been the first to spot it. :-)
Having said that, I've had 36 hour outages with other HSPs. But if clients only want to pay a couple of hundred squids a year for their hosting may be they're getting what they pay for.
I've known companies turning over 40k a month who insist staying on a shared server, and then get all upset when it goes down on a Saturday, but see you're getting me started again!
Other companies you may want to consider - Titan, IACL, Donhost. All IIS providers. Please don't mention my name, thanks!
At work mostly whenever a server goes boom the IT guys send up a flare immediately to let as many people as possible know there are/will be problems. That way when we perform stupid user trick #33 (forget about planned outages) the helldesk people can calmly remind people that the server is down.
I will not even mention the copying problems - that is unexcusable. I can MAYBE see the missing the ASP.NET settings, but not copying the files?
Sounds like someone needs a cattle prod applied to their dangly bits to stop this from happening again.
Post a CommentPermalink Subscribe to comments: this post | all posts
<< T*Blog Home