Previous Posts

Subscribe

Basic feed (just the blog)

The Uberfeed (blog, pics & links)

Via e-mail:

04.05  05.05  06.05  07.05  08.05  09.05  10.05  11.05  12.05  01.06  02.06  03.06  04.06  05.06  06.06  07.06  08.06  09.06  10.06  11.06  12.06  01.07  02.07  03.07  04.07  05.07  06.07  07.07  08.07  09.07  10.07  11.07  12.07 

Advertise on Becky's Web

Becky's T-Blog

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Unhealthy obsession

One of my many failings is getting obsessed when I think people are "cheating the system".

At the moment there's someone on Flickr who's posting loads of pictures to the tranny groups that she says are of herself, a male cross-dresser, and getting loads of comments about how fantastic and feminine she looks.

This is because it IS a woman. The pictures aren't of a tranny. I'm almost certain of it. The only slight wavering in my conviction is that so many other trannies on Flickr don't seem to realise it too. I know many friends DO share my view, but they're not as obsessed by it as I am.

Yeah, for those that remember, it's my Lana thing all over again. :-/

I'm poring over her pictures to find ways to prove she's a fake. There's very little good clues. It's subtle things like the complete lack of an Adam's apple, and a totally feminine body shape and face, which for a non-surgical non-hormone-assisted caucasian TV is more or less impossible.

It's not important I suppose, everyone fakes stuff. It's only Flickr.

Scratch that. It IS important or I wouldn't be getting worked up about it. I can't quite put my finger on why I think it's so important, it's something to do with giving other trannies realistic goals, and not lessening what I do with a lot of money, time, effort and emotional investment by just sticking up a picture of someone else and pretending it's all so "easy".

Ho hum.
Kat  Who?

We actually know a someone who pretended she was a post-op TS. We met and socialised with her several times and she was dating a pre-op TS friend of ours.

This person was a natal woman. Fcuking mad, eh? 
Valerie S  Personally I don't give a shite but it's not fair. It's not fair for the girls who got their features drawn with an axe , don't own a proper wig and don't know how to do makeup, and are still trying so hard and post their real pictures. Trying to get some acceptance and validating their appearance against the others. It's just not fair to post fake images and collect all the credit for free in a world where you have to work hard to earn it. 
Freiya  It's important because when someone does this and pretends that they're someone they're not it just confirms everyones sterotypes that the whole tg spectrum is full of deluded headcases. It doesn't make any of us look good, ts,tv, whatever, it makes us all look stupid and like we live in some sort of pathetic dream world. How can we change peoples pre conceptions about what being tg is like when all they see is this?
Also ( whilst i'm on a roll ), as valerie said earlier, it isn't fair, it's tricking people, hell, it's tricking whoever is posting these pictures, all stuff like this does is make peole feel worthless, when in fact they should be feeling proud of who they are.
and i'll shut up now :) 
Joanna  You already know my thoughts on this one. I'm 95% convinced they are fake pics. But it is going to be hard to prove.

And you are right (and Val and Freiya) in that it does matter - it provides a level of perfection that we can never strive towards. It's deception.

Its a toughie, and is going to be hard to prove or disprove. 
Emily S  I've just been working on some pics my FFS surgeon has given me with an idea of how I would look after FFS. Even posting those as me would be deceitful and you know what? Even in those pictures, I can see male features. This is going to cost me silly money and I will never look as good as a natal woman.

I'm 100% behind you on this... This does matter. It's already hard enough holding our heads up in a world all to quick to judge us without someone diminishing all the work we do by pretending they look like some model's pictures they found on the net. 
Becky  @Kat: That's incredible!

@Freiya: Don't shut up! that's exactly what my thoughts are.

@Janna: Hard to prove, but it's getting to the stage where the proof is in the pictures themselves now.

@Emily: If she'd used model photos that would have been bad, she's actually using pictures of some "ordinary" woman, possibly a relation. It gives the pictures a more genuine air, but I'm pretty sure whoever it is in the photos doesn't know they're being used this way... Oh and good luck with the FFS. I'm sure you'll look fantastic. :-) 
Magpie  Things like this really irritate me as well. All it's doing is to try to give the person posting the pictures a cheap thrill, and all it does is set up unrealistic goals for other people. This is the same reason I detest all the pictures that appear in magazines, the people that the pictures are aimed towards are never going to look that good, so all it does is lower people's self worth/opinion. 
Jane  Exactly my thoughts Magpie. Lying like this sets up unrealistic expectations which is a heartless thing to do.

Another thing about this person's pictures is that there are none of the classic tranny shots, no pictures in the hotel room glammed up, no pictures of herself on the bed, no pictures of herself taken with one arm extended (heck I've even got photos like that.)

Bex and I have chatted about this and I'm completely convinced that the pictures are of a natel woman. 
Nikki  As a postop TS woman myself with extensive experience of FFS and the differences between natal and ts wome - it is a perverse hobby of mine to know the difference - I wonder if you could post a link to the offending pictures please.

A friend of mine and me used to regularly root out fakers on TVC. Happy to give you my 2d worth.

Love
Nikki 
Steph Angel  OK... I'll own up, it's a fair cop...All those pics on my Flickr account are of a drop dead gorgeous super model I met on holiday a few years ago... Sorry folks ;-) 
Isobel  No Adam's apple, no brow ridges, no square back to the jaw, a shallow jawline, small hands, narrow shoulders, those eyebrows...
In fact, it would be much quicker to list the male features:
(1) Nope, can't see any.

It appears that dissenting comments are edited out from her photostream.

I can't see the point in doing this for real. I just can't understand that mentality.

Who said "Make the lie big enough, and it will be believed"? 
Joanna  Another thing about this person's pictures is that there are none of the classic tranny shots

And few shots that include the shoes... just not right I tell you! 
Rachel  There's always one, isn't there?

Me, I see an attractive TV/TS and I'm full of admiration. I see a TV/TS who's not classically beautiful, but you just know has made a credible effort, and appreciate that.

But when I see 'fake' pics I get a mixture of feelings. One, I feel sorry if they have such a lack of self-worth that they feel the need to substitute pics.

Two, and maybe this is a bit weird given number one, it amuses me that the con hasn't worked.

Another thing, why do people get upset about it being unfair? Life's not fair - life never will be fair. Get working on your own self-esteem so that when you see these pics, true or false, you don't get upset about them.

And as for the Lana episode that really did bug me. I just wish Becky had said to Lana, 'If you don't take those pics down I'll blow the whistle, giving her the opportunity to avoid the humiliation.'

To me, Lana had real self-worth problems which drove her to do what she did (which I'm not condonning or condemning) but Becky didn't give her the opportunity to remove the pictures. Yes, I know Becky made it clear she'd sussed Lana, but by giving her forewarning of her intention to "expose" her if she didn't remove them, I feel, it would have been a kinder course of action.

BTW, great holiday thanks Bex - got the red bits to prove it! 
Becky  I didn't really want to dredge all that up again Rachel, you've got your own opinion on it and that's fine. I still stand by my actions that day and I'd do it the same again if it happened tomorrow. It might have been the "kinder course", but it was the right course.

I disagree with your point about people gettting upset about things being unfair. It's got fuck-all to do with my improving own self esteem. And I take a different approach to life being unfair: I try to make it unfair for the person making it unfair for me.

For example: it's unfair to criticise me on my own blog about things that happened months ago. So I'll point that out to you, and delete any future messages on the subject. That's being quite unfair back.

@Isobel: I'm glad you've spotted her too. 
Anonymous  I've written a special application in Visual Basic that detects fake tranny pics. It was originally designed to tell the sex of cats, but then someone explained an easier way that doesn't need a computer.

Give us a URL and I'll get back to you with the Cat-Aware Personal Edition results. 
Becky  @Nikki and Anonymous: I'm not going to give out the URL on here. If you're active on Flickr it's fairly easy to work it out for yourself who I'm talking about. If it's not... them maybe I'm wrong! :-)

@Steph: I KNEW it! ;-) 
VB-W  It's a case of someone who disagrees with the whole matter and is trying to make the genuine ones feel inadequate. 
Siobhan Curran  > "Another thing about this person's pictures is that there are none of the classic tranny shots

Without wanting to add too much to this discussion, I'd hate to see us using grounds like that for suspicion ;-) Especially considering the whole "stereotyping" discussions that have gone on recently.

I was going to write something about being able to see the point to doing it - something along the lines of bumping up your self worth through the adoration of others ... but actually, thinking about it more, that's complete bollocks - because how can you turn compliments directed at a fake you into self-praise?

Which leaves me with a rather more unpleasant thought, that the reasons behind it are to laugh at the 'gulibility' of strangers, and it's actually intended as quite malicious 
Becky  "because how can you turn compliments directed at a fake you into self-praise?"

I think actually that they do somehow manage that, through some kind of highly selective view of reality.

"Which leaves me with a rather more unpleasant thought, that the reasons behind it are to laugh at the 'gulibility' of strangers, and it's actually intended as quite malicious"

That's the more disturbing option, and what I think Victius was referring to.

I just feel a lot better talking about this semi "out in the open", as I feel like I'm doing something more than gnashing my teeth at this person's audacity. :-) 
Becky  "Without wanting to add too much to this discussion, I'd hate to see us using grounds like that for suspicion ;-) Especially considering the whole "stereotyping" discussions that have gone on recently."

Oops, yes Jane, slap wrist. ;-) 
becca  (I've been clicking on too many things at once, so this may already be posted...)

This reminds me of last year's unveiling of J.T. LeRoy, the author who wrote The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things, among other works. The writer who everyone believed was a 20-something, cross-dressing, recovering heroin addict, former prostitute and literary sensation was actually a woman in her 30s named Laura Albert. 
jessica_sweet_tv  I agree, it is bad for someone to post fake pics.

Not only they not showing themselves and tricking us all to beleive the person in that pic is someone which in reality is not.

But also, taking into account all the effort that it takes, to put make-up, wig, clothes, to try to look as girly as possible at the end.

And then see a photo, of someone who looks so feminine, thinking "Wow , how lucky of he, or what great skills he has", about a fake pic, is sad, is EVIL. 
Stephanie Delacey  It's important because for me, and I'm sure for many others, posting pictures online is part of a process of self-acceptance. If other people are posting fakes pictures it just makes us look cheap and our efforts to come out rather pointless.

However, Becky, I do think that if you were going to raise this issue you should have "named and shamed" the person. I can't have been the only one who went straight from here to trawl through the tranny groups on flickr to try and work out (without success) who you were referring to. It made me feel dirty. 
Becky  LOL, any trawl through the tranny groups will make you feel dirty, Steph. And don't pretend you don't enjoy it. ;-) 
Kath Adams  you know I'm not deliberately contentious when I post on here don't you??

There's a really old cartoon from the New Yorker, which I've pinched and put on one of my web pages. I have thousands of photos of me. And about a dozen where I'm pleased with the result.

And three dressed as a bloke...

There are very few of my 'real photos' (ie 'grim') available for others to see. So, to a much lesser extent, the only 'honest' trannies are those who have candid photos that other people have taken while out and about?

My personal view is that Siobhan's comment Which leaves me with a rather more unpleasant thought, that the reasons behind it are to laugh at the 'gullibility' of strangers, and it's actually intended as quite malicious is sadly, closest to the truth.

Rallying against fake trannies is certainly one way forwards but I think that your web site and discussions like this on your blog are far more positive and powerful, as it's an environment where those people who are still struggling to find themselves can realise that they are not alone and aren't in a competition to be themselves. Discuss the fact that some of those fantastic photos, might actually be exactly what they appear to be.

And they can laugh out loud as they do so! 
Penny M  OK, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. I was born male and I don't like it. When I dress it is to deceive the world into viewing me as female. I'm trying to fool people into thinking I'm something I'm not. OK, I'm not very good at it, but that isn't really the point, my dressing is about deception. If a natal woman really wanted to present herself to the world as a post-op MTF, how would that be different from what I do? She was born one thing and wanted to be somethng else. I find it hard to believe that anyone would want to do that but hey, there are lots of wierdos out there!

As for levels of perfection that I can never strive for, well the thing that is so hard to live with is just walking down the street and looking at the real women. If I'm down that is a terrible thing to do.

Give me a reason to think differently and I will 
Siobhan Curran  > "If a natal woman really wanted to present herself to the world as a post-op MTF, how would that be different from what I do?"


That's a fair comment Penny, and an interesting question. But I don't think that's what's going on here.

Essentially, when I stick a photograph of me online, I'm asking people to suspend disbelief for a moment, take that picture of me, and judge it in an entirely different context (it's all about the context ;-) to what I'd normally present.

I'm saying "This is me. I'm a guy. But I'd like for you to judge me based on completely different criteria that if it was just a picture of me as a guy. I'd like you to judge me on how much I look like a woman"

I think the issue here - unless of course, there's a huge disproving of 'wrongness' - is contained in the word "me".

I don't think this is someone posting pictures and saying "This is me". I think it's someone posting pictures of someone else, and asking us to judge those images based on the same criteria that we all post pictures within.

Whether they're pictures of guys portraying themselves as women, or women portraying themselves as guys, or women portraying themselves as guys portraying themselves as women - I don't really think that matters.

The central core to them all is that they all deserve the tag "me". However we choose to present ourselves, it's always ourselves we choose to present.

The problems come when it's not ourselves in the photographs, That's when the "me" becomes the "other". And - I think - that's the lie that is central to all of this. 
Miss K  > the lie that is central to all of this.

Right, and that's the point. No matter how pretty the image, lies are ugly. 
Alli' Cat'  Becky, Isobel said, "dissenting comments are edited out from her photostream", so she must be reading them. Have you thought of posting a "We're talking about you here" comment, with a link to this discussion? 
Becky  I'll think about it Alli'. At the moment I'm waiting for a reply to an email. 
Connie Cox  Perhaps I don't have "her" as a contact. Who is it?

And as for fake pics? I bloody hate them. I like many have worked hard on my look and do worry if I can come across as feminine. So when someone posts fake pics it's as if they are just taking the piss. 
Isobel  Well, a certain someone is now no longer active on Flickr... 
Becky  Yep, looks like that's the answer to the email I sent him/her. 
Penny M  Doh! Have I completely missed the point of this Siobhan? I'll re-read this thread and this time I'll look at the words. Seriously though, if I could pass as a genetic woman, that would be the greatest thing in my life, but it would be a deception. Who am I to judge others who are deceiving people. In the 1960's the gay playwright Joe Orton and his partner took books out of their local library and altered them, changing the content and dust jackets. What they did would now be considered to be art in the manner of Banksy and others. what is the line between a prank that illuminates an otherwise hidden part of our culture, and an offensive lie?

Beats me! I'm just some poor tranny who stumbles through life the best she can. 
Stephanie Delacey  Yes, Penny, you have completely missed the point. Your introduction of Joe Orton is irrelevant. What we are talking about here are the tranny groups on flickr and in that context I think we have every right to expect that the pictures posted there are of trannies. Otherwise, why bother? Whether or not some of the photos are good enough to deceive anyone is neither here nor there. The person being discussed in this thread was not engaged in some art prank or making an illuminating cultural intervention or raising interesting questions about identity and deception. He was simply some sad and cowardly bloke putting up pictures of somebody else and pretending they are of him. In the context of flickr tranny groups that's pretty insulting and rather pathetic.

Oh, and you might find yourself stumbling through life a little less if you abandon the moral relativism. 
Penny M  Ouch, Stephanie!

I'm still not convinced. 

Post a CommentPermalink     Subscribe to comments: this post | all posts

<< T*Blog Home