Previous Posts

Subscribe

Basic feed (just the blog)

The Uberfeed (blog, pics & links)

Via e-mail:

04.05  05.05  06.05  07.05  08.05  09.05  10.05  11.05  12.05  01.06  02.06  03.06  04.06  05.06  06.06  07.06  08.06  09.06  10.06  11.06  12.06  01.07  02.07  03.07  04.07  05.07  06.07  07.07  08.07  09.07  10.07  11.07  12.07 

Advertise on Becky's Web

Becky's T-Blog

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Vaportrannies II

Dammit, maybe I should think things through a little more before I blog them sometimes. I blame in part the strident mood I'm still in after the "Shrek 3 Indoctrination" episode, I was a bit too black and white about the whole thing, for which I apologise.

In a way, I was following on from my recent "Versions" post. The point I was trying to make (albeit badly) was that some trannies never get to the equivalent of my "1.0", i.e. actually getting out of the door "en-femme".

But one tranny's 1.0 is another tranny's 0.5, or as Jayne put it:
"I could maybe argue that your are not really going for it, unless you have your man bits cut off like what I did!"
Which of course is true, I'd be mad to argue that there's a "right way" to be a tranny, and I'd be even madder to suggest that I was doing it the right way.

We all have this thing inside us to different levels, some need to express it more than others. We also all have different personal situations, so some of us are more able to express it than others. As Kat says:
"Maybe it is enough for someone to live out a fantasy online and manage to hold things together - like a family, marriage."
Exactly. I hope that I've not given the impression that I think "dressing up" is the be-all and end-all, it's not. Everyone has to make their transgenderism "fit" in the best way possible with their other aspirations and the needs of the people they care about. I'm far more admiring of the tranny who curbs their dressing to avoid hurting others than I am of the tranny who selfishly puts their own needs first above all other things.

That's not to say that all trannies who end being "selfish" about their need to dress have really any choice in the matter. It's a sad fact that because of the varying levels of transgenderism, and the varying types of environment in which transgendered people find themselves, there's always going to be an element of "hard luck" involved.

Every one of us are given two dice, red a blue.

Roll the red dice, that's your tranny score. The number represents the level of transgender expression at which you'll be happy.

Roll the blue dice, that's your environment score. The number represents the level of transgenderism you can express in your situation without problems.

If red is less than or equal to blue, well done! You've won the tranny lottery, you can be just as much of a girl as you want to be.

If red is more than blue, hard cheese. You want more than you can do without changing your lifestyle. You're either going to have to compromise or do things that will hurt those around you.

Some people roll low on both scores, they can't get away with much but they don't want much anyway. Maybe just chatting with other trannies online, or maybe a girly avatar in some online forum, is enough for them. That's fine, I don't have any problem with that.

The kind of person I was describing as a "vaportranny" are the ones that constantly profess to wanting to go so much further than they have, when actually they're happier where they are.

Look at it this way, if I were to say "I really want to live full time as a woman but my work/home life doesn't allow me to", some trannies who are living full time would quite rightly point out that they were in exactly the same situation and had to make some painful choices to get where they were.

In the same way I get annoyed when I hear closeted trannies bemoan the fact that they can never get further than they are because of their wife/overall manliness/work situation/whatever. The fact is, if they needed to do more, they would. They're just using those things as excuses to maintain a status quo that they're actually quite happy with.

Spot the difference between these two sentences:
"I wish I could dress up, but my wife hates it."

"My wife's wishes are important to me, so I choose not to dress up."
They both say basically the same thing, but the first one demonises the wife and places the blame for the decision on her shoulders, whereas the second one shows someone taking responsibility for their own choices, and shows that the reason they're not dressing is because they value the relationship with their partner.

Far too often I see trannies slip into language like the first example, blaming outside factors for the situation they find themselves in. When really they should be proud that they are able to moderate their activities to fit in with other things that they find important, and also thankful that they don't have the overriding urge that some trannies are cursed (or blessed?) with that forces them to ride roughshod over other's feelings to achieve their aims.

Another two sentences:
"I could never go out... because I don't pass."

"I don't go out... because I wouldn't be happy dressing in public unless I passed."
Again they both say basically the same thing, but the second one is being honest about the reason you don't go out, rather than using the inability to pass as an excuse not to go out.

The bottom line is if you need to go out you do it anyway. You do it if you've got size 14 feet, or if you duck to get through doors, or (like me) your tummy needs a little help to stop it sticking out further than your fake boobs.

Why is all this important? Because I worry that "new" trannies come online and find forums full of trannies bemoaning the fact that they're "trapped" in situations beyond their control, and they think that moaning is what trannies do. When actually we should all be trying to show how we're all making the best of the cards we were dealt (or to keep the earlier analogy, the dice we were rolled) and take responsibility for, and be proud of, the decisions we've made.
Luis Drayton  "Making the best of the cards we werre dealt" - I wonder what Stephanie Delacey would have to say about that! (No, I really do wonder - I'm not trying to make a point!) As for myself, the reason I haven't dressed in over three years now is 'cause I basically never feel well enough to make the effort - to dress, or do anything other than spend 16 hours of every day lying in bed (sweating) and the other 8 sitting in front of a PC screen (sweating)! Yet though I now find myself dreaming about make-up, heels and nice hairdos more than at any previous point in my life, I can't work out whether, given the opportunity, I'd ever actually WANT to dress for real! Whatever my decision, though, to what extent would it (not to mention my constant daydreamin') be the result of my not dressing all these years? Hmmm...I think I feel a blog coming on...(then again, maybe not - these sort of questions never have any answers...:p ) 
NH  Some great points made there. I guess I rolled a 1 and a 2 (goodness, that sounds like a Risk move that I've logged in a book) on my Tranny scores. I have a low desire (2 if I'm being generous) and a 1 for environment (maybe a 2 if I really pushed things but I don't particularly want to).

Like a school playground, there is some peer pressure in the online tranny community, and perhaps some of the Vapourtrannies feel that peer pressure to say the "right" things in front of the group in order to fit in better.

Just before I retired as Natalie, I remember too many times in the Angels chat room where I felt under seige by a core group of trannies...see if any of these statements ring a bell:

"I used to think like you, that I'll never transition, but you don't know what's going to happen down the line and what Portia, Denise, Davina, VickiMichelleDanni and SexySuz said to me was true...release the inner woman and now my breasts are coming along fine"

"Not been to Transmission? You NEED to go. I mean, you're not really doing it right if you don't have the desire to go out..."

"No such thing as a straight tranny, you're deluding yourself hon"

"Went shopping today for new shoes and some dresses...went to Dotty P's en femme and although there were a few glances, it was important for me to do."

These things are often said in a tone that could be interpreted as a "dare". Someone's upped the ante and they often forget that others can't or don't want to follow in their steps. I got fed up with 90% of the online tranny scene because a) I fell out of love with trannying and b) the "one size fits all" mentality of the loudest trannies.

The fact I still visit here says a lot about how much I respect and like the boss around here. 
Anonymous  Reading yesterday's post I couldn't help but wonder what your views are on those who wear skirts / dresses occasionally, sometimes at home somtimes not, but who don't feel they have an alternative identity so don't try to pass. Eddie Izzard for want of a better description, though I fear the derogatory description is HPW.

Reading today's post I guess you'd consider that to be just two low rolls of the dice? 
Becky  I've only ever used the HPW tag to describe the people who post pics of their midriff in panties on the net, which I do find distasteful. I'd never describe a trannies who are "part time" in the way you describe using that term.

There's nothing wrong with being "mildly" transgendered and acting accordingly, maybe just wearing the underwear or an item or two of clothing.

That's what I used to back in the day, and I apologise if the opinion I appeared to give in the previous was that there was something wrong with it. :-) 
Jayne  Gush, Becky Quoted me!

When I rolled them dice I kind of hit it hard. It really hurt me to see that I hurt my family so much, but as my therapist pointed out, sometimes you have to be selfish to survive.

The best bit of it though is not the who did what better, it is the sense of community I have got from places like this.

Becky, I wish I had half of your beauty and I bet many other girls here feel some of that too, but in a funny way, you helped me make my transition. I don't really mind if you are a sit at home "net" tranny or a full on Trans rights activist, you still inspired me to be myself with your gentle humour and quirky outlook. Thank you.

Damn, this not supposed to be a soppy post, I wanted a rant about freedom of personal expression... ;-) 
Lynn Jones  How you view your own sense of tranniness (if that's a word) is, I think, very much a "glass is half full" kinda thing. When you're frustrated because you can't go as far as you like, it can be easy to fall in to the negativity trap.

Incidently there was an article on happiness in Psychologies magazine... the quote "it's what you don't have, yet yearn for, is what makes you unhappy" lept out at me. If I take a step back and think what my life (and trans-life if you will) is, I'm actually very lucky.

The dice thing is a good analogy. A case of supply vs demand perhaps? I'm trying to think what gaming system had two dice like that... damn these closet role-player urges. :)

As to the 'HPW' tag or semi-dressing even, I think it's rude to look down on folk who want to express or explore things that way. I don't think any of us dressed up one day and got 'the look' down pat. It takes time and practice. 
Jayne  Oh by the way, just in case any one wondered, Yes it did and lots.

In fact seven months later it still really hurts.

Quick tip, really don't get them cut off unless you really need it! Eek... 
Alli' Cat'  Ok, fair do's, I'll let you off :-) 
Anonymous  > I've only ever used the HPW tag
> to describe the people who ...
That'll be me not being up to speed on every term. I had inferred the meaning when I had read it and as such thought it applied more widely (e.g. to wearing skirts without shaving ones legs - because one doesn't have the need to pass but still sees a skirt in a shop window and instinctively thinks "That's gorgeous, I've got to by that").
My misunderstanding there.

> And I apologise if the opinion I
> appeared to give in the previous
> ...
No apology necessary as I read both today's and yesterday's posts together and the dice analogy is a good one. 
Jessica Sweet TV  I would ask, is then a 1-2, better or worse than a 6-5.

In another line of thought
you say

Because I worry that "new" trannies come online and find forums full of trannies bemoaning the fact that they're "trapped" in situations beyond their control, and they think that moaning is what trannies do.

but new trannies sometimes are in that situation.

Plus, I find more scaring the forums that are all everything is perfect when going out, be open, and as one of the previous commenters said, one mentallity fits all. 
Carolyn Ann  I'm sorry, I missed the bit where I was supposed to figure out my trannyness-score.

I was curious how Becky's point would be taken; for one thing, I think she has a point: there are some for whom being a crossdresser is something that they aren't serious about. It's not "wrong", it's just yet another facet of being. (For them, I hasten to add!)

There are those who won't meet anyone, dressed or not. Sometimes it's because they're not ready, other times it's simply because they're not "serious" about "it" (whatever "it" is). I can't point to any one individual and say "they're not serious about being a crossdresser!"; likewise, no transsexual is ever going to tell me that I'm not serious about crossdressing because I won't acknowledge "what I really want", or some other such nonsense.

It's sort of like the guy who hangs around gay bars, but steadfastly maintains he's not gay. Why's he hanging about the gay bar, then?

Personally, and I know this is not going to be taken well, I thought the responses to Becky's initial post were less than understanding. Becky had a point, and to be shouted down simply because "you" didn't agree? I'm not convinced anyone really took the time to understand Becky's point. (Hang on a minute: I've got some bric-a-brac to avoid...)

Why do I think that? Because I didn't read anything but outrage against Becky. An automatic defense of the self, not a consideration of the motives of others. Becky does have a point about this.

And I thought the clarification and retreat from the original point not necessary in the slightest.

Carolyn Ann 
Anonymous  I had a thought at 5am, as you do.

In the dictionary meaning I am a TV (I wear skirts etc) and yet I wouldn't consider myself a trannie because I don't associate it with "dressing as a woman" just with not seeing why clothing has to have two categories.

I didn't always have this clarity in my mind though: a ex-girlfriend was convinced that I would want to more than just wear skirts at home, that I would want to go outside, that I'd want to pass, that I'd want to be a woman. I tried to explain that she was wrong, that that wasn't the reason I liked skirts. Yet she was sure she was right and that left doubt in my own mind: maybe I was deluding myself, maybe there was an "Emily" I was surpressing. Since it was about that time I first wore a skirt outside I began to think that maybe this was the first step on a long road.

Therefore I read blogs (thought didn't post) and thought about things and I even went to that shop near Euston station, London. That, however, was a turning point as I then realised that this wasn't me, the ex-girlfriend was definitely wrong, I wear skirts not because I "want to be a woman" but because I have a wider than usual taste in clothes - though knee-length skirts and knee-high boots seem to feature rather a lot ;-)

I therefore wonder if this might explain some of the vapour-trannies; perhaps they think or are told their desires must mean more than they admit, so they go on-line, join communities, post a lot, push the envelope, before finally finding their level and disappearing from the "scene" (I use quotes because I not sure I like that word).

Like I said this was a thought at 5am so appologies if it is just waffle. 
Stephanie Delacey  "Making the best of the cards we were dealt" - I wonder what Stephanie Delacey would have to say about that!

Erm, I would say that Becky and I were using the same metaphor to different ends. I was referring to the conservative belief in biological/social determinism which holds that "the cards we are dealt with" are dealt just once (at the beginning of our lives). Becky, on the other hand, was comparing, it seems to me, one's current situation to a hand of cards - a hand which one is in the process of playing and which once played will lead to a new hand being dealt. One way of using the metaphor is static, the other is dynamic :-p 
Luis Drayton  Mmm. Yes. I see what you mean. In fact, now you say it, I can't help thinking I shoulda seen that for myself; I just saw the line in Becky's post, remembered your "Life Is Not a Game Of Cards" article, and wondered if there might be some sort of connection. At the time, though, my brain was too tired for me to try and work out whether there was a connection; so I decided to just ask straight out! 
Katew  Loads of great points here from Becky and everyone else too. I think the first post could be taken the wrong way (not the way Becky actually meant it) particularly if you are a bit paranoid/ guilt-prone / defensive which of course most of us are (it comes with the territory and heels) - but it was all cleared up with the second post. Just to make sure I got it straight (correct me if I'm wrong) what you object to Becky is those people who are moaning about their environment dice, when their tg dice means they are actually content with their status quo. And what some of the others are complaining about is those with a high tg dice who exert peer pressure on the first group by inferring they are 'lesser' tgs because they don't 'walk the walk'.
I reckon my environment dice is a 1 for most of the time, which is why I tend to dissappear for huge swathes of time. I'm not sure what my red dice is but I seem to be able to cope. 

Post a CommentPermalink     Subscribe to comments: this post | all posts

<< T*Blog Home