Post-Op or Never-Opped?
I'm probably not as obsessive as I used to be, because I haven't seen one in ages. And these days my work is pretty much done for me by all the people who make a point of emailing me when their suspicions are aroused. I'm sort of seen as the unofficial Faketrannyfinder General.
A blogger that shall remain nameless, unless she wants to name herself, sent me a candidate this morning. I'm going to let you join in on the fun with this one, because I must admit she's not made any of the obvious mistakes that I look for. There's just a chance she's a fantastic looking post-op TS. If so, I'm quite happy to doff my metaphorical hat to her. And I'd hope she'd take it as a compliment that she's aroused suspicions of fakery, because I know I would.
So... Real Fake Girl or Fake Fake Girl? You decide!
Edit: After discovering that the pictures really were fake, stolen from a clothes catalogue site (see comment from Lauren below) I sent a (polite, honest!) email to the person in question, asking for the pictures to be taken down. The person no longer appears to be active on Flickr, so the link above now points to a screenshot of the old page.




Thought of me because of my equally impressive passing level, Jessica? :D
Being in a positive mood at the moment, I decided to give it the benefit of the doubt. I guess I'd like to believe that TG's could look that good.
@Helena: Funny you should say that, I thought 'catalogue' too.
Firstly it's this line in her profile - "Due to the fact I do not have a pro account, I am unable to message any of you beautiful ladies back". Is she stupid? But if so, how did work out how to hide her exif data? Why does she hide it? The dates given as titles just don't ring true. Are we supposed to believe that a pretty pre-op TS who is accepted by everyone she knows has only got these posed shots taken in the space of a fortnight? As Helena pointed out they are obviously catalogue pics. Every pose taken from the back, for instance, is identical!
I find it hard to believe that on one day (the 27th of January) a TS would photograph herself wearing four or five different tops in the same few poses. Why? What woman do you know - if you photographed her everyday for a fortnight would have hair that looks exactly the same in every picture. I suspect the pictures were taken at the same modelling session (and that's why the exif data is missing). The colours of her clothes don't ring true either - a red dress and a blue one and a yellow one and a green one and a black one. I don't think so - no woman I know thinks she looks good in every colour of the rainbow.
Some girls really do look that good, I have spent a considerable amount of time with someone that I would never have known was TS until she told me.
Exhibit B.
Sorry, but I'm an old cynic. At some point I will explain how I worked it out, but for now I have to go to bed.
Let's all individually post a comment with the link - and keep posting every time she takes them down.
Anyway, I won't be posting on her photos as Vic suggests; I don't have the energy to get into a fight at the moment. I just wanted to know.
0711 LIGHTWEIGHT JERSEY TOP. £15
75% Acrylic
25% Polyamide
Available in Brown. Blue. Midnight. Taupe.
Sizes: 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
Also, a TG who has about 30 pictures of themselves but none of them featuring knee high boots or any stockings or tights? Not possible.
Again, can't find it now so maybe she's gone already with a bit of luck.
Maybe someone challenged her. Certainly wasn't me. Or maybe she reads Becky's blog.
LOL Joanne at Monica Bellucci - I wish I'd seen the comments to that!
Post a CommentPermalink Subscribe to comments: this post | all posts
<< T*Blog Home