Cognitive Dissonance - Part 1
I'm suffering from cognitive dissonance, brought about by not caring at all about something, and simultaneously missing it terribly. That "something", for want of a better word, is "trannying".
Now the logical part of my mind tells me that it's not wise to maintain two differing beliefs at the same time. The reason that it's hard to resolve my feelings on "trannying" is it's just too big a thing, and a thing that is made up of lots of smaller things. I have differing levels of desire for each little thing, which it's impossible to pin down my feelings for the whole thing.
Still with me? Good.
Wow, this logic thing is good isn't it? Lets look at the big thing that is "trannying" and try and tease out all the little things that went into it. Then we can examine them separately and decide if they're the parts that I miss, or the parts that I "meh", and maybe even why
Things that "trannying" is made of:
Dressing Up - Uh, yeah, obviously. The defining characteristic of being an active transvestite is the actual wearing of women's clothes. But do I actually miss not doing it? Well, no, not really. I still think like a transvestite, and there's still a sexual thrill about the concept.
Sexual thrills are a funny thing though. I could reel off a long list of things that I've heard are turn-ons for folks. Heck, half of the internet exists to cater for them. Name a completely random activity and chances are there are a thousand people who get their kicks out of it; but for the thousand people who want to (excuse me while I spin the Wheel Of Random Turn-Ons) ... "Make Love to Baroness Thatcher", how many have actually done it?
I'd hazard a guess at somewhere around zero. They've probably read fiction about making love to Baroness Thatcher, they've probably written fiction about making love to Baroness Thatcher, some of them probably even have Baroness Thatcher "Real Dolls"... (excuse me while I just go vomit) ...
Anyway, that in some way is the point of sexual thrills, the idea is often more enjoyable than the reality, and most people can survive quite happily toying around with the idea in their heads. Maybe there's merit in trying things out in reality, if only to "get it out of your system" in which case count your lucky stars if your secretly held fetish is possible, socially acceptable, and most importantly legal.
I was lucky that my personal spin of the wheel came up "Put on Ladies' Things", which is possible, legal, and possibly more socially acceptable these days than it's ever been. For a given value of "socially acceptable".
So I "got it out of my system", for now. It may come back. It's funny how it hangs around in the corners.
Case in point: in the bottom of our laundry basket there's a pair of undies that belong to a maid costume. They've been their for ages, because we tend to only wash stuff when there's enough items of that type to make a load, and I can't see us needing to do a "black PVC items" wash any time soon. Plus, I kind of like the idea of having a pair of PVC maids undies in the laundry basket; it makes me smile every time I get to the bottom of the pile.
This was going to be one long blog post, but it's shaping up to be three. So I'll stop here for a while to let you digest and make astute comments. Or just say something tangential about PVC knickers, you choose! :)




There is no contradiction about your thought processes. There were always 2 aspects to my trannying days. As you said, the dressing up/getting off thing (If you know what I mean), and the liberation of not conforming to all that macho stuff.
I too regard myself as a lapsed tranny. I just fell off on the other side, although its tougher for me to return, unless I buy a pipe and grow a 'tash!
PVC knickers > knickers to PVC I say !
alan
Can't say I understand though, I'm currently getting withdrawal symptoms again. Although whether its Pandora-time or the associated stuff is a mystery. (Being Pandora also means there is a party or event, that I get to see my friends, and I get to blow off steam for a bit)
Unless there is some sort of cotton gusset of course!
Not that I have much experience of PVC or anything ;-)
My first thought - and hopefully I won't be sued - was the late Sir Denis. :-)
If we're going to talk about fantasy - no, not about the Iron Lady (men only, so I hear. She's "not for turning") - then by definition, isn't it always going to be better in your head than in reality?
If I'm honest then there is a sexual element to it and while I feel odd about saying this (guilt? public perception?) that's more the actual idea of it rather than the execution. The dressing up thing is fun, don't get me wrong, but it's not sexy-fun-time. But we're all different, so what's right for me may well be truly different for the rest of you.
With Junior on the way, is the imminent arrival and associated joy/ responsibility influencing the whole gender business?
I dunno. We're all different (thank you Brian).
So I think that's nothing new. Above all, a person who's reached such an unusually comfortable, safe and sane balance in their life (and you do seem to be that person) shouldn't feel the need to justify failing to crossdress, any more than you used to try to justify being Becky.
Life is change. I sometimes miss those whole days in my childhood when I constructed vast, complicated things out of Lego... but if I got the stuff down out of my parents' attic and tried it now, I'm sure I'd find the experience disappointing.
Looking forward to parts 2 and 3 of this article!
The question is, which version of Action Man is more amenable to the wearing of those Barbie/Sindy outfits?
Post a CommentPermalink Subscribe to comments: this post | all posts
<< T*Blog Home